Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 3248 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than FX-8150 - 196 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
153
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |