Buy on Amazon
CA$149.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 808 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 16% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 189 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$149.99 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$0.79 vs CA$1.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$149.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14100 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
