Buy on Amazon
CA$99.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 514 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$99.99 vs CA$834.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - CA$0.53 vs CA$4.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105F - 190 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 4-Core Comet Lake Processor 3.70GHz 8GT/s 6MB LGA 1200 CPU Retail
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.39/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$834
11%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$834 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
