Buy on Amazon
CA$159.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1620 - 206 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$36.89 vs CA$159.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
23%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
