Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 35% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8150 - 123 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$87.12 vs CA$159.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.3 per FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
73%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
91
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |