Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-7920X - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$143.23 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 76% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.79 vs CA$3.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$143.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$143.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |