Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 771 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$113.5 vs CA$1123.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 22% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G6900 - 257 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
257
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1123.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,123.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
96.16076784643072%
Multi-Core
2696
20.24479987985282%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |