Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 539 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - CA$113.5 vs CA$1987.31
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 366 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65814 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
366
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1987.31
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,987.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
95.64439140811456%
Multi-Core
2696
21.824657977819154%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |