Buy on Amazon
CA$120.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 603 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G540 - 189 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CPU Processor FX-Series FX4350 FX-4350 FX 4350 4.2 GHz 125W Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4350FRW4KHK Socket AM3+ Good Performance, high Efficiency, Clear Picture
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
84.43496801705757%
Multi-Core
679
55.838815789473685%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
