Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 646 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Celeron G530 - 79 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
79
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |