Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1006 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 54 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 188 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |