Buy on Amazon
CA$250
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 915 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3930T - 118 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
32.159624413145536%
Multi-Core
948
13.126557740238162%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
