Buy on Amazon
CA$434.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2478 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 73% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G3930T - 209 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-14600KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$434.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-14600KF New Gaming Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) - Unlocked
Buy for CA$434.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-14600KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron G3930T or Core i5-14600KF
Dead Island 2, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
132 FPS
CA$13.4/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
Core i5-14600KF
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,768.58
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
