Buy on Amazon
CA$33.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980XE is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-9980XE - CA$33.99 vs CA$1635.05
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9980XE - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980XE
- Performs up to 13% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - 236 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 36 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76897 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-9980XE 18 Cores 3GHz 24.75MB 8 GT/s 165W LGA 2066 CPU SREZ3
Buy for CA$1,635.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-9980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
40.91549295774648%
Multi-Core
992
8.833481745325022%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 18 |
| 2 | Threads | 36 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
