Buy on Amazon
CA$33.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$33.99 vs CA$1156.84
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 171 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 48 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76672 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1156.84
2%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core, 48-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$1,156.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.85302939412118%
Multi-Core
992
7.449125178343471%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
