Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$66.34 vs CA$1670.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$0.32 vs CA$6.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 17% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - 244 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17832 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.84/FPS
4%
Price, CA$
CA$1670
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,670 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |