Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - CA$67.56 vs CA$221.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-7400 - CA$0.3 vs CA$0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3900 - 242 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
93.80165289256198%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3671 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
32.967032967032964%
Price, CA$
CA$221
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$221 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.404761904761905%
Multi-Core
992
30.693069306930692%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |