Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1187 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G550 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |