Buy on Amazon
CA$66.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
