Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 978 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |