Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Celeron G3930T - 178 vs 177 FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |