Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3222 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1820 - 214 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$676.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
16.515304406323576%
Multi-Core
825
4.104273419232874%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |