Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 546 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1610T - 193 vs 189 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
