Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610T outperforms Core i7-4712MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610T is 132 days older than Core i7-4712MQ.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 35 vs 37 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-4712MQ
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
