Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610T - 126 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
