Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 140% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1610T - 48 vs 20 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
