Buy on Amazon
CA$87.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 418 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610T - 146 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
