Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610 - 286 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
