Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 456 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 55 vs 65 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
