Key Differences
In short — Celeron B820 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron B820 is 2102 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |