Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 114 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Celeron B820 - 599 vs 582 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
599
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |