Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2480 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 17 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Celeron 847 - 161 vs 142 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |