Buy on Amazon
CA$375
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2496 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 66% better in F1 23 than Celeron 847 - 208 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
