Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4712MQ outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4712MQ is 1360 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 15 vs 37 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 3865U - 123 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |