Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 897 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron 3865U - 135 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |