Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 551 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-6500 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 3865U - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$105.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$105.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |