Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 1533 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron 3865U - 196 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |