Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron 3865U - 326 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 32 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
326
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |