Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1975 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron 3205U - 237 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 20 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$425
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |