Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 2607 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 68% better in Starfield than Celeron 3205U - 69 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$408.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$408.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |