Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2179 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Rust than Celeron 1000M - 208 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$465
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$465 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |