Buy on Amazon
CA$145
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2284 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in God of War than Celeron 1000M - 174 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
