In Battlefield 6, the FX-8320 is much slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $92 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 51% cheaper – $88.10 vs $179.99
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 1% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.44 vs $1.45/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Up to 103% faster in Battlefield 6 – 124 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 103% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
49%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
49%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
99%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
