Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$207.51 vs CA$279.00
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 135% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8300 - 552 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 42% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8300 - CA$0.51 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$207.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7760 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
552
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279
74%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7760 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |