Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - CA$207.92 vs CA$279.00
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-12700KF - CA$1.44 vs CA$1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8300 - 183 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
144
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$207.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$207.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$279
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |