Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - CA$160.47 vs CA$249.00
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-12600K - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.00 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 49% better in Dota 2 than FX-8150 - 248 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
166
67%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$160.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7306 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
248
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
97%
Price, CA$
CA$249
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7307 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |