The FX-6350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6350
The Core i9-10900 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-10900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 6 threads
FX-6350 vs Core i9-10900
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
182
87%
Min 1% FPS
126
88%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-10900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-10900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $483.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
