Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$107.04 vs CA$199.73
- Up to 36% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.48 vs CA$0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than FX-6300 - 266 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
223
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$107.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$107.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7725 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$199.73
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$199.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7451 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |