The FX-6300 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's CA$125.37 more expensive!
FX-6300 vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189.88
33%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
34%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
CA$64.51
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
FX-6300 vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
