Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$107.04 vs CA$716.28
- Up to 79% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.58 vs CA$2.75 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-6300 - 260 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
184
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$107.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$107.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7720 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
260
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.75/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$716.28
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$716.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7720 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |