Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3725 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 37% better in Battlefield V than FX-6300 - 285 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$191.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$191.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |